HMRC wins £42k late filing penalty row
It's sometimes possible to appeal against a late filing penalty on the grounds that there was a “reasonable excuse” for the lateness. However, you have to be able to meet further conditions. How does a recent Upper Tribunal case demonstrate that a penalty can be upheld, even if there was a reasonable excuse?
-
New HMRC guidance on winter fuel payments
HMRC has released new guidance on the recovery of winter fuel payments. What do you need to know?
-
Festive tax breaks for remote workers
You’re familiar with the tax break for Christmas parties but you now have a few remote workers, and the company will need to reimburse their travel and accommodation costs if they attend an event. Which costs count towards the tax-free limit and how can you manage any overspend?
-
New process for some exports starting in Northern Ireland
Starting next month, businesses that import goods via Northern Ireland will need to change their processes. What do you need to know?
In Harrison v HMRC [2022] UKUT 216, the taxpayer (H) believed that his advisors had submitted his 2014/15 tax return by the due date of 31 January 2016. H experienced a series of distressing events and was informed by his newly appointed advisors that his previous advisors had not submitted his last tax return. H admitted that sorting out his tax return was at the bottom of his priority list as he was dealing with various family and business problems. The return was finally submitted in September 2018. Whilst the courts accepted there was a reasonable excuse for the late filing, it could not be said that the return was submitted without reasonable delay. He had continued complex work on his business during the period. Therefore, the continued failure to submit the return resulted in an eye-watering tax geared penalty of £42,066 for deliberately withholding information. The appeal was dismissed.
This highlights a little-known fact that where the return is over twelve months late the penalties are based upon a percentage of the tax liability depending upon the taxpayer’s behaviour, i.e. deliberate/concealed. H endured several extremely difficult events and suffered from depression but was found to be capable of approving his tax return in spite of this.





This website uses both its own and third-party cookies to analyze our services and navigation on our website in order to improve its contents (analytical purposes: measure visits and sources of web traffic). The legal basis is the consent of the user, except in the case of basic cookies, which are essential to navigate this website.