Private residence relief - when does home ownership begin?
A couple bought a plot of land and built a new home on it. When they sold it HMRC assessed them for capital gains tax. They appealed and won. HMRC disagreed with the ruling and referred it to the Upper Tribunal (UT). What was the outcome?
-
New HMRC guidance on winter fuel payments
HMRC has released new guidance on the recovery of winter fuel payments. What do you need to know?
-
Festive tax breaks for remote workers
You’re familiar with the tax break for Christmas parties but you now have a few remote workers, and the company will need to reimburse their travel and accommodation costs if they attend an event. Which costs count towards the tax-free limit and how can you manage any overspend?
-
New process for some exports starting in Northern Ireland
Starting next month, businesses that import goods via Northern Ireland will need to change their processes. What do you need to know?
The case
HMRC v Gerald and Sarah Lee 2023 was heard by the Upper Tribunal (UT) and followed the First-tier Tribunal’s (FTT) decision in favour of the Lees (L). The dispute concerned the amount of private residence relief (PRR) that L was entitled to for the capital gain they made from selling their home.
Period of ownership
In October 2010 L bought a property and soon after had it demolished without ever living in it. They built a new house on the land that was completed in March 2013 and which they lived in as their home until it was sold in May 2014. They made a gain from the sale of more than £550,000. They claimed PRR for the whole gain. HMRC said that L’s home only existed for part of the period of ownership (March 2013 to May 2014) whereas the gain accrued over the whole period from October 2010. Therefore, in HMRC’s eyes PRR was limited to the period from March 2013.
HMRC’s appeal
After the FTT kicked HMRC’s argument into touch it appealed to the UT. The arguments put forward from both sides were unchanged and centred on their respective interpretations of the law regarding the meaning of “period of ownership” for PRR purposes.
L’s argument
L stuck with their argument that the asset they made the gain from was the home they built and so ownership for PRR purposes started in 2013. General capital gains tax rules and HMRC’s internal guidance indirectly support this view but the PRR rules say nothing on the topic. In the absence of a specific definition, L’s view was that the natural meaning of the phrase “period of ownership” refers to the asset sold, i.e. their new home.
HMRC’s counter
To bolster its original argument HMRC added two new analogies to support its view. First, the PRR rules are clear that if a person buys a lease on a property and later purchases the freehold, the “period of ownership” starts with the date of the lease purchase. Second, if L and the FTT were correct that ownership for PRR purposes commenced when the new property was completed, it would mean that legislation passed in 2020 - the subject of extensive discussion and a Court of Appeal ruling which confirmed ownership for off-plan homes starts when the contract to buy the plot is signed - would have been unnecessary.
The UT’s ruling
The UT found conflicting evidence supporting both sides, but on balance decided L’s argument gave the right result and so ruled in their favour. It’s unlikely HMRC will appeal against the decision. The ruling sets a precedent for individuals who buy land, with or without buildings on it, who then construct a dwelling and occupy it as their only or main residence. For PRR purposes only, the period of ownership starts when a property is ready to occupy so that when working out the PRR, the relief period before construction can be ignored.
This website uses both its own and third-party cookies to analyze our services and navigation on our website in order to improve its contents (analytical purposes: measure visits and sources of web traffic). The legal basis is the consent of the user, except in the case of basic cookies, which are essential to navigate this website.